When I got involved years ago the internet was still fairly young. The Fluoroquinolone community was untouched, for the most part, by those with less than stellar intentions, or those driven by fame, fortune and the needs for monetary compensation. With the rise of the internet as the ‘go to’ source for all things medical, there has been a rise in victimization, or at the very least those wanting to make a ‘quick buck’ at someone else’s expense. I spent over thirty years in law enforcement and I take a dim view of people getting victimized and I am very adamant and non-apologetic about it. Fluoroquinolone toxicity destroys lives and causes undue hardship on individuals and families. Often times people are left struggling financially, putting some in dire straights with very little means to support themselves.
Whether it is individuals who claimed to be have been mildly floxed and have now found a niche internet market or practitioners who should be selling used cars (not to disparage car salesmen), the list of complaints that I have received has become quite varied.
Obviously, people are perfectly free to spend their money where they choose, I however have personal experience, received comments and sometimes complaints from people who I consider trustworthy about certain items or services that are questionable. The value one places on information is quite subjective and is a tenuous argument and with this in mind, this information is placed here as cautionary information only, so individuals can weight the cost/benefit ratio, especially with limited resources.
It is my personal opinion based on my experience or information relayed to me to avoid the following:
The URL was originally owned by the now defunct Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Research Foundation (which had very helpful information and a archive of their website can be found here). This URL has since been purchased and is NO LONGER associated with the individual who ran the Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Research Foundation. The new website is interspersed with scientific facts and is highly SEO’d to basically up-sell the expensive “Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Solution Ebook”, which in my opinion, and the opinion of some others who have purchased the book and shared their feelings with me, is nothing more than a collection of community acquired knowledge that is way over priced. Plus, marketing anything as a solution, treatment or cure about FQ toxicity is dishonest in my opinion.
Also, I would also be very suspect of any website that links to this book to offer affiliate sales, no matter how scientific they appear.
Sell site for the “Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Solution Ebook”
Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Solution Ebook
“Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Solution Ebook” basically covers optimizing magnesium and vitamin D levels, in addition to some basic information on supplements and exercises. It in no way is a ‘solution’ to the problem of FQ toxicity and it is frankly offensive to market it as such. Oh sure, someone may learn to get the magnesium and vitamin D levels checked, but to pay almost $40.00 for information that is available numerous different places on the net is, in my opinion, outrageous.
You can get more for free by reading the “What Help’s” page on this website. Contributed by floxies for floxies, and it’s free!
Consultants & Bloggers That Sell
With the exception of one other blog, Hurt by Levaquin, run by my fellow FQ friend John Fratti, I have been online longer than the rest. I have put thousands of hours into researching FQ toxicity and have worked with researchers at three different universities. I have a good understanding of the current level of knowledge that is available on FQ toxicity. However, I’m not a doctor, and I certainly don’t try to play one on the internet. I am just trying to figure fluoroquinolone toxicity out, since most doctors won’t touch it with a 10 foot pole. The reason I am saying this is not to tout or flaunt myself but to reiterate that despite my knowledge, I do not charge for the knowledge that I have acquired and I find it atrocious that anyone, other than what constitutes a professional doctor/patient relationship, would charge for such information.
As I have written before, floxing devastates and victimizes individuals, and since I am privy to the fact that there is no secret or inside information on treatment, procedures, or cures, individuals charging for consultation is, in my opinion, highway robbery and unacceptable. Many times desperate people are unsuspecting and easily victimized. They come across highly SEO’d blogs where the author has literally flooded the Internet with pseudo-scientific web pages designed to generate web traffic back to the website. There, the author markets e-books, links to lawyers or law groups, and/or offers to consult or ‘sell their time’ to help synthesize FQ information. Although some may find this acceptable, knowing what information is out there, I believe it is tantamount to victimization. Please, if you have already fallen prey to FQ toxicity, use extreme caution if deciding to patronize a ‘consultant’.
This excerpt is from a post comment I received from a doctor looking for information on FQ Toxicity:
“Although I may disagree with some of David’s conclusions, at least this site is clearly written by some who is not pretending to be something else. I am afraid several of the quinolone related community sites masquerade as offering legitimate science, we assume, to people looking for factual science answers. Most of the articles seem to be nothing more than a thinly veiled promotion of the author and are devoid of anything that can be considered basic scientific journalism. Because of this I can surmise that many of my esteemed colleagues who are led into a legitimate search, by having to wade through, and take the time to dismiss this conjecture and pseudo-science that is parading as science, ironically walk away disheartened not enlightened. “
Also read my cautionary tale on Internet Health Consultants.
Genetic Testing Companies
Although I am not against genetic testing by any means, I have had several complaints about the level of service from the genetic testing company MEDomics http://www.medomics.com and I recommend against patronizing them.
If one is considering genetic testing, a reliable genetic testing company with good communication, good reputation, and recommendations from Mitochondrial support groups is, Courtagen at http://www.courtagen.com/
Floxies have used mitochondrial (genetic testing) to identify genes that can be pathogenic both nuclear and mitochondrial and that may have been switched on by the FQ’s. This is the wave of the future and I hope to write an article soon about what it can and cannot do.
Quinolone Vigilance Foundation (QVF)
Although I, along with a handful of other floxies, started the QVF with the best intentions, I, and the original group who founded the QVF are no longer involved in the organization and I do not support the QVF. The organization in my opinion has drifted dramatically from its original intent. I have written an article that expresses my main reasons for my opinions. It can be read here.
In addition, against cautioning to the contrary, the QVF has participated in the recent past with the health organization WEGO, that has on its board, members of pharmaceutical companies that produce and sell Fluoroquinolones!(a)
Additionally, the QVF works with and supports the progressive medical center in Atlanta (1), whose medical director Dr. Bouquette (2) had his license suspended in 2011 by the Georgia Medical board for the death of a patient while doing a alternative chelation therapy (3). Although I do not have anything against alternative health treatments, please do your due diligence research and become as informed as possible when making your decision about both the facility, doctor, and procedure.
“Due to the nature of scientific inquiry and publication in the United States, in my opinion no academic researcher will work with an organization that has on it’s formal board, members of the chiropractic complementary system, or aligns itself publicly with alternative health institutions.” … prominent FQ researcher.
The fact that the QVF continues to align itself in a biased manner towards for profit institutions, alternative health institutions, and law groups under-girds my opinion. These, any many more, are examples of what I believe exemplifies poor judgment and lack of vetting that continues to plague the QVF within its leadership and will prevent it from ever spearheading the pursuit of academic acknowledgement of FQ toxicity.
With the advent of the Internet and increasing web technology it is harder to gauge motives of the entities behind websites. Although many websites may appear well intentioned or informative, their motives may be to sell, collected data for other entities, or basically increase web traffic in order to make money through increased traffic. Now I know that selling is part and parcel with the Internet but I have a dubious opinion of any medical information website that engages in such activity dealing with the fluoroquinolone toxicity travesty. Why? Because, like I said above, I have seen this travesty destroy too many lives, families, and careers, so I am very protective of people being victimized further whether it be financially or emotionally. In my opinion, it amounts to fleecing already victimized individuals. You can read about my pledge here.